We typically don’t put much weight on how one market period compares to another, especially when looking at price graphs. The market composition, the environment and the participants change too much over the years for us to give much weight to simple chart comparisons between the TSX or S&P 500. However, similarities in the market environments can make these comparisons more useful.

We considered the similarities between today’s market environment and that of 1998, and found a number of strong commonalities. Both 1998 and 2018 are roughly the ninth years of historically long bull market runs. That means both are clearly in the late bull phase of the market cycle. Both cycles had the US equity market as the clear leader compared to other developed and emerging markets. The US dollar was also one of the stronger performing currencies, similar to today. In 1998, a currency crisis started in Russia and spread to a number of Asian emerging economies, which triggered the correction and a global growth slowdown. It was notably less for the US and more for other economies such as Europe and Asia. This cycle, we have had crises in Argentina and Turkey, and now slowing economic growth in China weighs on global growth. Again, more for non-US economies.

Currently, the S&P 500 is down 11% from its late September high. In 1998, the S&P bottomed at closer to -20%. One could argue markets were a bit more inflated in the late 1990s, making the drop more painful. The P/E ratio for the S&P 500 dropped 4 points from 22x to 18x in 1998, compared to a drop of 3 points from 18x to 15x so far in 2018. The TSX, which started falling earlier than the S&P 500, is now down 12% from its high. The bad news is that in 1998 the TSX ended up dropping almost 30%.

The drop in global growth expectations was much more severe in 1998 relative to the current state, especially in the emerging markets (note we said ‘current state’ as things can change). This certainly weighed more on the TSX, given its resource tilt. In 1998, the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) nations’ GDP dropped from 2% growth into negative territory for two quarters. Europe was slowing and the US remained pretty resilient to the global slowdown (left chart below). Fast forward to today and we have the US remaining on a healthy growth path, Europe losing steam and the BRIC nations showing some signs of slowing. Clearly, the current situation is not nearly as dire as 1998 at this point. And if you believe current 2019 consensus forecasts (yellow bars in the right chart), there does not appear to be a sudden deceleration in the cards.

Long correction

The current spell of market weakness seems like it just keeps dragging along. It sure feels that way to us. The S&P 500 peaked on September 21, which means this correction has lasted +80 days. Given the current level is not far from the recent December 10 low, it’s hard to say if that was truly the trough or there is another leg down. If it was today, it would be the longest peak-to-trough among the last ten corrections. This isn’t one of the most severe yet, but relative to other corrections during the cycle, it is a big one. The average number of days from peak-to-trough has been 35, with an average decline of 10%.

The next chart shows all the past corrections for the S&P 500 during the current bull market and how they played out. The purple line is the average and the yellow line is the current market. The only two that were near these depressed levels after this amount of time was in late 2010 and 2011, during the European financial crisis.

Some encouraging signs

We need not be all down on the markets, as there are some positive developments, even as we watch the markets close the week near session lows. Today, the S&P 500 is trading below 15x, the TSX is below 13x and Europe is below 12x. That is cheap. Sentiment has turned very bearish, which has historically been bullish. The American Association of Individual Investors survey this week found only 21% felt bullish and 49% bearish about the stock market over the next six months. That is the highest percentage of bears since 2013.

Also, emerging markets are outperforming developed markets. Emerging markets started weakening quarters ago. Clearly, we all should have paid more attention to this canary in the coal mine. Emerging markets tend to be more sensitive to changes in sentiment and global growth, given the higher reliance on trade, less developed financial sectors and at times, a jittery shareholder base. The fact that emerging markets have been outperforming the developing markets in the past few weeks may be a sign the end of the corrective phase is near.

If none of those are right, Santa is coming soon…


— Craig Basinger, Chris Kerlow, Derek Benedet and Alexander Tjiang are members of Richardson GMP’s Connected Wealth team which manages Purpose Core Equity Income FundPurpose Tactical Asset Allocation Fund and Purpose Behavioural Opportunities Fund

Charts sourced to Bloomberg unless otherwise noted
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. The indicated rate of return is the historical annual compounded total return including changes in share/unit value and reinvestment of all distributions and does not take into account sales, redemption, distribution or optional charges or income taxes payable by any securityholder that would have reduced returns. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated
Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.